International Journal Information Systems -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The International Journal Information Systems? Answer: Introduction: In this report, the pertinent analysis of the auditing standard is carried out, in which ASA 701 Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditors Report is evaluated in the context of Sirtex Medical Limited. According to the annual report of the organisation in 2017, it has not conformed to the above-stated standard, in which the independent audit report does not contain any type of key audit matter. The pertinent risk assessment arising due to material misstatement in compliance with ASA 315 is analysed in the context of Sirtex. This report would enable in identifying the actions that the organisation needs to undertake in its financial statements for helping the investors to gain an insight of the pertinent misstatements. It has become necessary for the organisations to include the communication of key audit matters in their annual reports after the financial crisis. This is because they were not reporting the required data in their annual reports (Arens, et al., 2015). With the enforcement of this standard, the accounting bodies have compelled the organisations to comply with the regulation in order to minimise the happening of the next financial crisis. In addition, the organisations are accountable primarily to disclose the explanatory materials in the independent reports of the auditors. This revelation is carried out mainly due to the standard depicted in ASA 701, which could signify the real financial position to the stakeholders. Evaluation: With the help of appropriate evaluation of the annual report of Sirtex in 2017, the material misstatements could be identified that could raise complexities of the organisation. After the financial crisis was over, the authorities identified issues in the financial reports of the organisations, in which they did not disclose all the relevant information. Thus, this issue has lead to the formation of ASA 701, which is a measure of revelation that is required to be communicated in the annual reports. Thus, it has become crucial for the organisations to make pertinent disclosures of key audit matters in their annual reports. The analysis of the annual report of Sirtex enables in identifying considerable risk with ASA 315, which could have influence on its business operations. As commented by Byrnes, et al. (2015), material misstatement helps in estimation and pertinent analysis of the issues in future that could be projected. In addition, after assessment of the annual report, any type of issue restricting the business activities could be anticipated, this would allow the investors in identifying the organisational problems. However, as argued by Cuadrado-Ballesteros, Martnez-Ferrero and Garca-Snchez (2017), the unscrupulous measures of the company could increase, if the material misstatements are not disclosed. The analysis of the annual report of the company could eventually enable to represent greater risk, if the material misstatements are conducted in compliance with ASA 315 as follows: Evaluated areas of material misstatement containing greater risk: After assessing the annual report of Sirtex, there is absence of any pertinent key audit matter, which it could communicate to its shareholders. This minimises the adherence of the company to ASA 701 in revealing the pertinent matters. The assessment of the annual report primarily enables in representing disclosure to the users of financial reports of the organisation. Sirtex is not complying with the rules of ASA 701 that has minimised the feasibility of its annual report. The pertinent revelation of key audit matter is not shown in the annual report of the company. This signifies primarily the lack of adherence to ASA 315, which the auditor and the organisation are not following. Along with this, if ASA 315 is used, it could help the investors of the firm in identifying the risk of material misstatement inherent within the organisation (Simnett, Carson and Vanstraelen, 2016). The accounting policies that the organisation has implemented primarily enables in representing its real financial position. However, if the key audit matters are not represented in the annual report of Sirtex, it denotes primarily the non-adherence to ASA 701. In addition, various corporate scandals have occurred in the past, in which the auditors have unethically depicted the financial strength of the firm (Cohen and Simnett 2014). This might question the credibility of the independent report of the auditor in the absence of key audit report. The auditors of Sirtex are required to gain an insight of the business risk, in which the detection of material misstatement is crucial to be carried out. Moreover, the auditors need to assess the risks related to business environment, business operations and other types of risk before the audit processes are dissected. The analysis of the top down approach that the organisation uses could raise the probability of material misstatements, since there is no employee participation in the decision-making process of the organisation. Hence, the organisation needs to understand the business risk, as it might appear in the form of audit risk at a later point of time. In this context, Farewell and Pinsker (2015) cited that it is vital for the auditors to analyse each business process of the company for understanding the actual risk resulting in material misstatement. The enforcement of ASA 701 is made after the end of the financial crisis in 2007. This crisis has enabled the board of audit assurance in identifying unscrupulous measures, which the organisations and independent auditors conduct at the time of developing the financial report. Such unscrupulous measure in developing financial report has depicted mainly financial strength of the company that has enhanced share value. Thus, it has enabled the firms in retaining additional capital from the market (Farooq and De Villiers, 2017). During financial crisis, all organisations involved in using unscrupulous practices declined and there were no investors to buy their shares. As a result, the financial stability of the capital market and the global economy were shaken. Thus, it is clearly evident that the enforcement of ASA 701 is primarily a step that the audit assurance board has undertaken to minimise the unscrupulous practices of the organisations. In addition, the firms had used their debts in the form of income for hiding their insolvency positions from the investors (Hay, 2015). The ASA 701 aims to restrict the firms in adopting unethical practices to develop their annual reports, which would assure transparency in their financial positions. Considerable risks detected in compliance with ASA: Along with the non-representation of the key audit matters, there is no material misstatement in the organisation according to the independent audit report of Sirtex. However, in conformance to the auditing standard ASA 315 that the audit assurance board has conducted, the auditors could realise the material misstatement risk in the financial books of the organisation (Soh and Martinov-Bennie, 2015). According to ASA 315, it is necessary for the auditors to follow the guideline laid out in the paragraphs from A9 to A11 and from A27 to A30. As a result, the auditors could detect the material misstatement, which might increase the overall audit risk. This pertinent evaluation could enable the auditors in identifying frauds, which the companies might make for inflating their balance sheet statements. In this regard, Junior, Best and Cotter (2014) remarked that the auditors could be able to identify frauds with the help of measures laid out in ASA, which the companies make in developing their annual reports. However, it has been argued that the management influences the independent auditor in using unscrupulous measures in the audit report for inflating the overall financial performance of the organisation. However, the latest annual report of Sirtex does not adhere to ASA 315, since the auditor has not identified any material misstatement (Sirtex.com, 2018). Along with this, it is required for the auditors to follow the paragraphs laid out in ASA 315 from A105 to A108, as it would help them to detect the material misstatement risk inherent within the overall business operations. Furthermore, the analysis could enable in asserting various levels of classes of transactions at the time of identifying the audit process performance. The auditors are able primarily to identify financial risks at the time of evaluating the financial statements of the company in detecting material misstatement restricting its financial stability. Thus, by enforcing the audit procedures, it is possible for the auditors to identify the financial feasibility of the annual report of the organisation (Knechel and Salterio, 2016). Extent and application of the research: The annual report of Sirtex fails to adhere to the ASA standard, which is the utmost requirement for every Australian organisation. Such non-adherence in developing the key audit matters could lead to direct rise in audit risk of the company. This pertinent audit risk could be detected through the audit procedures that the auditors are needed to follow. The auditors need to follow the railways procedures for dissecting risk associated with the overall business operations (Kend, Houghton and Jubb, 2014). Initially, the auditor needs to assess detection of risk related to the business objectives, as laid out in the financial statements. As a result, the material misstatement could be detected, which could represent the inaccurate financial statements of the company. Secondly, the auditors are required to approximate the significance of risk to the management of the organisation, which needs to conform to the rules of the audit assurance board. Along with this, the probability of happen ing of certain risks is required to be detected on the part of the auditors that might raise the material misstatement of the organisation in future (Leung, et al., 2014). Furthermore, the pertinent activities that the company has carried out are required to be assessed for detecting any type of risk arising from such actions. Financial areas in the report requiring considerable judgement of the management: The organisations are required to carry out various levels of internal control in order to minimise the risk arising due to material misstatement. Moreover, the assessment of internal control for a particular entity is needed to be carried out on the part of the independent auditors in order to detect the possibility of material misstatement. According to the Paragraphs A36 to A41 laid down in ASA 315, pertinent insight of the industrial divisions and risk related to the overall business operations are required to be assessed on the part of the auditors. Such analysis could enable eventually in identifying the external factors, which could be applied on developing the financial report (Li, et al., 2017). The auditors are needed to gain an insight of the internal control procedures of the organisation for effective completion of the audit procedure. This could enable the auditor eventually in gaining an overview of the complicated internal control processes, which the organisation mak es for carrying out its business operations. Along with this, most of the internal control procedures that the auditors assess are required to conform to the financial reporting process, since the identification of material misstatement is the primary priority for the auditors. In accordance with the paragraphs A42 to A65 laid down in ASA 315, the auditor could carry out the expert judgement of the assessor in relation to specific control for detecting those controls, which could result in material misstatement. In this regard, Marques, Santos and Santos (2016) advocated that by analysing the business operations and annual report of the organisation, the auditor could identify any type of risk that could result in material misstatement in the financial report. The auditor conducts the audit procedure, which should be comprehended in the control environment where the business operations take place. This analysis could enable the auditors to gain an overview of the total activities that the administration within the company is involved in conduction. As a result, any type of material misstatement could be identified inherent within the organisational governance. In addition, this would enable in identifying the culture of integrity and ethical behaviour inherent within the staffs and management of the organisation. Hence, it is of utmost significance for the auditors to dissect external as well as internal control of Sirtex in order to detect any type of material misstatement, which could be inherent in the business operations. However, both the independent auditors and directors of the company have not identified any material misstatement in the overall business operations (Martnez-Ferrero and Garca-Snchez, 2016). Moreover, the identificati on of material misstatement could help in depicting the real financial position of the firm. As a result, the auditors could present the true picture of the financial position of the firm to the associated stakeholders. Such material misstatement could be depicted directly in the section of key audit matter in the annual report, which could raise the viability of the annual report. Impact of significant transactions and events happened during the period: The analysis of significant transactions and events that the organisation has conducted during the accounting year is required to be assessed on the part of the auditors. This analysis could enable the auditors to identify any kind of odd activities or risk that might raise the possibility of material misstatement (Simunic, Ye and Zhang, 2017). At present, Sirtex is involved in providing all the pertinent information about its activities in the annual report. Henceforth, various influence of the transactions and event happened during the period could be assessed on the part of the auditors. The various accounting standards like ISA 260 could be violated on the part of the company and issues about internal audit processes might increase eventually. As pointed out by Vanstraelen and Schelleman (2017), firms adopting all the pertinent accounting standards are able to depict the real financial condition to the stakeholders that signify the integrity of the organisation in carrying out it s operations. In addition, the analysis of considerable events could enable the auditors in detecting any type of risk engaged in internal as well as external factors of the company. In addition, the external and internal processes could be analysed on the part of the auditor during the year. This type of detection of various kinds of risk detected from operations could enable the auditors in understanding material misstatement of the firm. In the words of William Jr, Glover and Prawitt (2016), organisations use the independent report of the auditor in the form of cover in order to restrict the pertinent unscrupulous measures carried out in the financial year. Conclusion After analysing the pertinent ASA standards like ASA 315, ASA 701 and ISA 260, firms are required to depict their real financial positions in their annual reports. Thus, Sirtex Medical Limited is needed to develop key audit matters in its annual report for detecting any type of material misstatement inherent in its business operations. In addition, it needs to comply with ASA 315 and ASA 701 in its operations to adhere to the audit assurance board. Furthermore, the organisation is required to gain an overview of the pertinent regulations and standards, which needs to be complete to depict the actual financial report. Such transfer of information from the auditors to the investors could enable in understanding the real financial condition of the companies for making effective investment decisions. References: Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J., Beasley, M.S. and Jones, J., 2015.Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements. Pearson Canada. Byrnes, P.E., Al-Awadhi, C.A., Gullvist, B., Brown-Liburd, H., Teeter, C.R., Warren Jr, J.D. and Vasarhelyi, M., 2015. Evolution of auditing: From the traditional approach to the future audit.Audit Analytics,71. Cohen, J.R. and Simnett, R., 2014. CSR and assurance services: A research agenda.Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory,34(1), pp.59-74. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martnez-Ferrero, J. and Garca-Snchez, I.M., 2017. Mitigating information asymmetry through sustainability assurance: The role of accountants and levels of assurance.International Business Review,26(6), pp.1141-1156. Farewell, S. and Pinsker, R., 2015. Does Assurance on XBRLDerived Financial Statements Impact the Decisions of Nonprofessional Investors?.Management Accounting Quarterly,16(3). Farooq, M.B. and De Villiers, C., 2017. The market for sustainability assurance services: A comprehensive literature review and future avenues for research.Pacific Accounting Review,29(1), pp.79-106. Hay, D., 2015. The frontiers of auditing research.Meditari Accountancy Research,23(2), pp.158-174. Junior, R.M., Best, P.J. and Cotter, J., 2014. Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon.Journal of Business Ethics,120(1), pp.1-11. Kend, M., Houghton, K.A. and Jubb, C., 2014. Competition issues in the market for audit and assurance services: are the concerns justified?.Australian Accounting Review,24(4), pp.313-320. Knechel, W.R. and Salterio, S.E., 2016.Auditing: Assurance and risk. Taylor Francis. Leung, P., Coram, P., Cooper, B.J. and Richardson, P., 2014.Modern Auditing and Assurance Services 6e. Wiley. Li, C., Raman, K.K., Sun, L. and Wu, D., 2017. The effect of ambiguity in an auditing standard on auditor independence: Evidence from nonaudit fees and SOX 404 opinions.Journal of Contemporary Accounting Economics,13(1), pp.37-51. Marques, R.P., Santos, H. and Santos, C., 2016. Evaluating information systems with continuous assurance services.International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS),8(3), pp.1-15. Martnez-Ferrero, J. and Garca-Snchez, I.M., 2016. The level of sustainability assurance: The effects of brand reputation and industry specialisation of assurance providers.Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-20. Simnett, R., Carson, E. and Vanstraelen, A., 2016. International archival auditing and assurance research: Trends, methodological issues, and opportunities.Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory,35(3), pp.1-32. Simunic, D.A., Ye, M. and Zhang, P., 2017. The joint effects of multiple legal system characteristics on auditing standards and auditor behavior.Contemporary Accounting Research,34(1), pp.7-38. Sirtex.com., 2018. [online] Available at: https://www.sirtex.com/media/168332/sirtex_annual_report_2017.pdf [Accessed 29 Jan. 2018]. Soh, D.S. and Martinov-Bennie, N., 2015. Internal auditors perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting.Managerial Auditing Journal,30(1), pp.80-111. Vanstraelen, A. and Schelleman, C., 2017. Auditing private companies: what do we know?.Accounting and Business Research,47(5), pp.565-584. William Jr, M., Glover, S. and Prawitt, D., 2016.Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach. McGraw-Hill Ed